Unloading in Remote Areas by Karie Luidens

Arizona+Yuma+District.jpg

Hundreds of migrants cross Arizona border after 'several busloads' dropped off in Mexico

By Geneva Sands, CNN
Updated 1:15 AM ET, Tue January 29, 2019
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/28/politics/migrants-arizona-arrests/index.html

(CNN) In the early morning hours Thursday [1/24/19], several busloads of migrants were dropped off on Highway 2 in Mexico, just south of the Arizona border.

"They walked about 100 yards, climbed under and over the vehicle barrier that is the only infrastructure in that area and agents were called in to make the arrest," said acting Tucson Border Patrol Chief Jeffrey Self.

In total, 242 people -- mostly families from Guatemala -- were arrested when Border Patrol agents arrived at the scene after the migrants were detected by a mobile surveillance system.

This was one of the largest single groups crossing the Arizona border over the last year, according to Border Patrol, and comes on the heels of other large groups illegally crossing at other parts of the border.

Similar to other groups of families, these migrants willingly surrendered to Border Patrol with no attempts to evade or hide from authorities. […]

In December, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan raised concerns that a new trend was emerging of very large groups of migrants arriving at the southern border by bus and unloading in remote areas.

"So far in this fiscal year, and this has been a brand-new phenomenon this fiscal year, we have started to see extremely large groups arrive together several times, usually once or twice a week since about mid-October," said McAleenan in December.

The trend appears to be continuing into the new year.

With Mile-by-Mile Analysis by Karie Luidens

2019-01-31 - ABQ Journal.jpg

Torres Small favors ‘carefully placed’ border barriers based on detailed plan

BY RICK NATHANSON / JOURNAL STAFF WRITER
Published: Thursday, January 31st, 2019
https://www.abqjournal.com/1275359/torres-small-favors-carefully-placed-border-barriers.html

One of New Mexico’s newest members of Congress, Democratic Rep. Xochitl Torres Small is often painted as an advocate of open borders, but on Thursday she stressed that is not the case.

Torres Small represents New Mexico’s 2nd Congressional District, which shares about 180 miles of its southern border with Mexico. Physical barriers, she said, make sense when they are strategically placed.

In an interview about her new committee assignments in Congress, she also discussed border issues. She will chair the Subcommittee on Oversight, Management and Accountability for the Committee on Homeland Security, and will sit on the House Armed Services Committee.

About 65 percent of New Mexico’s border with Mexico “already has a physical barrier of some kind,” Torres Small said. And they can be effective when they have been “carefully placed, based on a detailed plan about where it makes the most sense.” [...]

Regarding barriers on the border, Torres Small said, “I’m very grateful to have had the experience of living and working on the border. I started working for Sen. (Tom) Udall right after the first fence or physical barrier was put up. When that happened, I talked to Customs and Border Patrol about how it was done, and it was done very carefully.

“I’ve seen places where a physical barrier works, because they divide the terrain based on the time it takes for someone avoiding detection to disappear, whether it’s in a car or into urban populations. In some places, it is seconds to minutes, in other places it is minutes to hours, and in places like the New Mexico bootheel, it can be hours to days.”

That’s why it’s important to design and place walls according to the terrain.

“We’ve seen that barriers really work to delay people from crossing; so if it delays someone 20 minutes, that makes a big difference in an urban area where you can get an agent there quickly to interdict them,” she said. “But when it takes days to cross a desert, that 20 minutes doesn’t do a whole lot of good.”

The last time Congress passed legislation about physical barriers, “it was based on a detailed plan about how it would be implemented on the ground, with mile-by-mile analysis,” she said. “So just throwing out a number and saying you want to build physical barriers isn’t enough to create real border security.”

Ranchers in New Mexico’s remote Bootheel recently told the Journal they support barriers along the border, especially in light of the large groups of migrants illegally crossing by simply stepping over low fencing in recent months.

We Feel There Is an Imminent Threat by Karie Luidens

New Mexico ranchers frustrated with situation along U.S.-Mexico border

Chris Ramirez
January 25, 2019 04:20 PM
HIDALGO COUNTY, N.M.
https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/new-mexico-ranchers-frustrated-with-situation-along-us-mexico-border/5220568/

When a crime occurs on ranch land, they call the Hidalgo County Sheriff’s Office for help, but the sheriff admits help is not always available.

“The citizens aren't protected," said Hidalgo County Sheriff Warren Walter.  “We need to have more manpower.”

The Sheriff’s Office only has four working deputies to cover 3,500 square miles.  

“With my four officers – days off, vacation time, sick leave-- we can't cover 24 hours a day,” said Sheriff Walter.  “We are basically 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. at night.  That's the best I can do.  In my honest opinion, that's not fair to the citizens of the county.” 

And when a deputy is at the border responding to a crime, that leaves the rest of the county unmanned.  The situation is so desperate, the Hidalgo County Manager wrote a letter to the governor and Senators Martin Heinrich and Tom Udall, begging for more assistance. 

Hidalgo County Manager Tisha Green wrote in part, “we feel there is an imminent threat to the safety and welfare of our citizens in Hidalgo County.  Resources such as medical, law enforcement and sanitation are amongst those most needed.”

“The calls I get from citizens, they state there are people in their backyards, they are seeing several on a daily basis, and people are breaking into their homes, stealing different items.  They feel like they are not safe, not protected” Green told KOB during an interview, in response to her letter.

Ranchers and Hidalgo County officials hope the state can help fund more deputies.  They also want Santa Fe politicians to see what they are seeing.  In early January, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham visited the Santa Teresa Port of Entry in Dona Ana County and said she didn't see a crisis.

“While I've been to this area of the border many times, I haven't seen anything that indicates that we have an emergency crisis here at the border and that's important to talk to New Mexicans about and I also think it's important to talk to the nation about.”

The governor’s words deeply offended the ranchers.

“The asinine idea that these politicians spout out that ‘oh our border is secure, there is not a crisis here.’  For them, there is not.  They live in Washington or they live in Santa Fe and they only come here to secure ports.  It's a crock.  And it's absolutely insulting to the people who live down here," Kris Massey stated during an impromptu town hall. 

Their Citizens Here on the Border by Karie Luidens

“Surge in border crossings fuels demands for border wall”

BY ANGELA KOCHERGA / JOURNAL STAFF WRITER - LAS CRUCES BUREAU
Saturday, January 26th, 2019 at 11:41pm
https://www.abqjournal.com/1273362/surge-in-border-crossings-fuels-demands-for-border-wall.html

ANIMAS – Residents in this remote ranching town in southern New Mexico complain they’ve been forgotten and left out as Washington and Santa Fe debate border issues.

“It’s just kind of a slap in our face, because our government doesn’t want to do anything, doesn’t want to protect their citizens here on the border,” rancher and business owner Tricia Elbrock told the Journal in an interview.

She and other ranchers in New Mexico’s Bootheel say they need a border wall and more security as the region, long a drug smuggling corridor, has also become a hot spot for guides leading large groups of Central American migrants to Antelope Wells.

“We need more boots on the ground, more resources. Build the wall and quit fighting in Washington, D.C.,” Elbrock said. […]

The Border Patrol says drug traffickers are now taking advantage of the recent surge in migration by making smuggling runs at the same time large groups of Central Americans cross the border and turn themselves in to Border Patrol agents.

Last week, agents seized 265 pounds of marijuana from suspected “drug mules” just west of Antelope Wells the same night a group of Central Americans was taken into custody.

“We’ve had the drug smugglers, we’ve had them coming in for years. But it just seems a lot more pronounced now, and then of course now you have an actual distraction to allow more drugs into this country,” Hidalgo County Manager Tisha Green said.

Let’s Focus on the Bootheel by Karie Luidens

New%2BMexico%2BMap.jpg

…That last article from yesterday had a line that jumped out at me. Its author said that California has “the most troops among the three border states.”

But there are four border states.

I assume he meant the three border states where Trump’s administration deployed troops to assist with Border Patrol operations in late 2018, i.e. California, Arizona, and Texas. For whatever reason, none of those 5,000+ troops ended up in New Mexico—even though our state has 180 or so miles of international border. Those miles include three official ports of entry at Santa Teresa, Columbus, and Antelope Wells, but they’re extremely remote: most of the New Mexico–Mexico border is open desert and ranches.

Still, New Mexico has seen its share of migrant crossings and other activity along its southwestern border. It was just a week ago that the Albuquerque Journal reported on a group of 306 Central American asylum seekers turning themselves in to the Border Patrol near Antelope Wells. The article noted that their arrival was part of a pattern going back several months now:

This is the 26th group of more than 100 people to come across the border in the remote area in New Mexico’s Bootheel region since October. Most are Central Americans seeking asylum, and many are from Guatemala.

So let’s forget Washington’s rhetoric and stunts for a minute. Let’s briefly put aside the protests and politics of our state capital up in Santa Fe. I want firsthand accounts of what it’s like on the ground in the so-called Bootheel, the southwestern corner of land that juts down into the Chihuahuan Desert.

How are things these days in New Mexico’s borderlands?

Troops Deployed to the Border by Karie Luidens

Concertina+Wire+-+Nicholas+Phelps.jpg

The announcement earlier this week that more troops have been ordered to the U.S.-Mexico border prompted me to comb through relevant coverage from the last few months and edit together a timeline to help me grasp the facts.


Where is the migrant caravan from – and what will happen to it at the border?

David Agren in Huixtla and Amanda Holpuch in New York
Wed 24 Oct 2018 12.19 EDT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/24/caravan-migrants-what-is-it-where-from-guatemala-honduras-immigrants-mexico

Thousands of Central American migrants, including men, women and entire families, are walking through southern Mexico, in the hope of reaching the US.

The group has grown steadily since setting out from the Honduran city of San Pedro Sula on 12 October, but the exact size is unclear as there is no single organizing group. […]

People in the group say they are fleeing grinding poverty, and the violent crime which has helped turn Central America into one of the most dangerous regions of the world. […]

No one in the group seems to know exactly which route they will take through Mexico. At the moment, the caravan is moving along the sparsely populated coast of the southern state of Chiapas, more than 1,243 miles (2,000km) from the US border. […]

Some have speculated that the caravan might take a longer route towards California where they may hope to receive more sympathetic treatment in immigration courts than they would do at closer border crossings in Texas. […]

Most of the people who make it to the border are likely to turn themselves in to US authorities and claim asylum, although a few – mostly younger men – have said they will attempt to cross illegally if that is not possible.

Trump has said he will not let caravan members in, but the US is legally obliged to consider the cases of asylum seekers.


MIGRANT CARAVAN: U.S. MILITARY WILL HAVE UP TO 14,000 TROOPS, MANY ARMED, READY TO INTERVENE AT MEXICO BORDER

BY JAMES LAPORTA AND TOM O'CONNOR
ON 10/29/18 AT 5:58 PM
https://www.newsweek.com/migrant-caravan-us-military-troops-mexico-border-armed-1192578

The Pentagon announced Monday [10/28/18] that it will send up to 5,200 troops to the border ahead of the anticipated arrival of a caravan of Central American migrants that President Donald Trump has warned would not be able to enter the country. These troops, which "are in fact deploying with weapons" will join up to 2,000 National Guards already at the border for a combined force of about 7,200—or about the same amount of U.S. soldiers involved in the battle against the Islamic State militant group (ISIS) in Iraq and Syria.


Here are the rules of engagement for troops deploying to the Mexican border

By: Tara Copp
November 2, 2018
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/11/02/here-are-the-rules-of-engagement-for-troops-deploying-to-the-mexican-border/

President Donald Trump on Thursday told troops deploying to the border they could shoot migrants who might throw rocks at them.

[Editors note: President Trump appeared to walk back his remarks about rules of engagement on Friday.]

But what troops will actually be able to do — or should do — is tightly governed. […]

All active duty forces dispatched to the border are governed by the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids troops from carrying out law enforcement duties inside United States territory unless Congress grants an exemption.

Under the act, federal military forces are prohibited from engaging in direct law enforcement, which includes making arrests, conducting searches, seizures, apprehension, evidence collection, interrogations, security patrols, seizures, stop and frisks, surveillance, crowd and traffic control, enforcement of a quarantine or isolation, or other similar police functions.

Congress has amended that act some to increase the authorized level of support the military may provide for drug interdiction and to support border patrol.

According to the Congressional Research Service, under the extended support, the military may provide "assistance in maintenance or upgrade of equipment; transportation of personnel; establishment and operation of operations or training bases; training of law enforcement personnel; detecting and monitoring traffic within 25 miles of the border; road and fence construction; light installation along smuggling corridors; the establishment of command and control centers and computer networks; the provision of linguist and intelligence analysis services; and aerial and ground reconnaissance.”


Deployed Inside the United States: The Military Waits for the Migrant Caravan

By Thomas Gibbons-Neff and Helene Cooper
Nov. 10, 2018
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/10/us/deployed-inside-the-united-states-the-military-waits-for-the-migrant-caravan.html

There has been no money set aside to combat the men, women and children who are bound for the American border, many of them fleeing violence or corruption, nearly all seeking better lives. The troops are tasked with the same types of logistical, support and even clerical jobs that National Guard soldiers sent to the border earlier this year are already doing. [...]

In late October, the Department of Homeland Security sent a memo to the Pentagon with a series of formal requests for support in handling immigrants at the southern border, including the caravan on its way from Central America, according to two senior administration officials.

Among the requests, issued at the White House’s behest, were that troops deployed to the border be armed, prepared for direct contact with the migrants and ready to operate under rules for the use of force to be set by the Defense Department.

When Defense Department officials replied the same day, on Mr. Mattis’s orders, they rejected those requests and referred the Department of Homeland Security to the White House, the officials said. The Defense Department viewed the requests as inappropriate and legally treacherous, potentially setting up soldiers for violent encounters with migrants.


James Mattis visits troops stationed at US-Mexico border

By Yaron Steinbuch
November 14, 2018
https://nypost.com/2018/11/14/james-mattis-visits-troops-stationed-at-us-mexico-border/

Defense Secretary James Mattis on Wednesday defended the deployment of thousands of US troops to the border with Mexico, saying the mission was “absolutely legal” and provides good training for war.

Mattis, who visited the troops near the Texas town of Donna along with Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, likened their mission to that of soldiers sent to counter the Mexican revolutionary Gen. Francisco “Pancho” Villa in 1916.

“It’s very clear that support to border police or border patrol is necessary right now,” the Pentagon chief said, noting that that was the assessment of the Department of Homeland Security.

While Mattis visited the troops at the southern tip of Texas near the Gulf of Mexico, migrants in a caravan of Central Americans scrambled to reach the US border some 1,500 miles away in Tijuana.


Why migrants won’t see armed US troops on the border

By: Julie Watson, The Associated Press
November 18, 2018
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2018/11/18/migrants-wont-see-armed-us-troops-on-the-border/

Of the 5,800 soldiers and Marines, more than 2,800 are in Texas, while about 1,500 are in Arizona and another 1,300 are in California. All U.S. military branches, except the Coast Guard, are barred from performing law enforcement duties.

That means there will be no visible show of armed troops, said Army Maj. Scott McCullough, adding that the mission is to provide support to Customs and Border Protection.

"Soldiers putting up wire on the border and barriers at the ports of entry will be the most visible," he said.

Marines and soldiers share the same duties in California and Arizona. These include erecting tents, setting up showers and arranging meals for troops working on the border, and assigning military police to protect them.

There are no tents or camps being set up to house migrants, McCullough said. Medics are on hand to treat troops and border patrol agents — not migrants — for cuts, bruises and any other problems.


Pentagon: Troops deployed at US-Mexico border to cost about $210 million

Robert Burns, Associated Press
Published 12:51 a.m. ET Nov. 21, 2018
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/11/20/pentagon-troops-migrant-caravan-united-states-mexico-border/2076399002/

As hundreds of exhausted people in a caravan of Central American asylum seekers reached the U.S. border in Mexico on Friday [11/16/18], American troops worked to fortify the fence and port of entry separating the two countries with strands of razor wire.

Using thousands of military troops to help secure the Southwest border will cost an estimated $210 million under current plans, the Pentagon told Congress on Tuesday, even as questions arose about the scope and duration of the controversial mission. [...]

About 2,800 of the active-duty troops are in South Texas, far from the main migrant caravan in Tijuana, Mexico, south of California. The movement of the Central American migrants into Mexico in October was the stated reason that President Donald Trump ordered the military to provide support for Customs and Border Protection.

Trump, who called the migrant caravan an “invasion,” has been accused by critics, including some retired military officers, of using the military deployment as a political tool in the run-up to the Nov. 6 midterm elections.


US begins to withdraw soldiers deployed to the border

Monday, December 10, 2018
By Associated Press
https://www.abc15.com/news/national/us-begins-to-withdraw-soldiers-deployed-to-the-border

The U.S. this week will begin withdrawing many of the active duty troops sent to the border with Mexico by President Donald Trump just before the midterm election in response to a caravan of Central American migrants, U.S. officials said Monday.

About 2,200 of the active duty troops will be pulled out before the holidays, the officials said, shrinking an unusual domestic deployment that was viewed by critics as a political stunt and a waste of military resources.


Troops Continue Deployment At Border Over Holidays

Thursday, December 27, 2018
By Steve Walsh
https://www.kpbs.org/news/2018/dec/27/troops-along-border-receive-high-profile-visitors-/

About 2,600 active troops remained deployed along the U.S. border with Mexico over the holidays. With 1,200 troops stationed in California, the state has the most troops among the three border states.










Washington’s Another Story by Karie Luidens

Patrick+Shanahan.jpg

Meanwhile, 1,870 miles east in Washington D.C.:

Thousands More Troops Heading to Border as Defense Dept. Officials Defend Deployments

By Helene Cooper and Catie Edmondson
Jan. 29, 2019
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/29/us/politics/border-troops-pentagon.html

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is poised to send at least 2,000 more active-duty troops to the southwestern border, Defense Department officials said Tuesday, deployments that have already cost the military hundreds of millions of dollars and thrust the department into the center of the debate over border security and President Trump’s proposed wall.

The acting defense secretary, Patrick Shanahan, told reporters that the United States would be sending “several thousand” additional troops to provide more support for the Department of Homeland Security’s border patrol efforts. Defense Department officials later said that they expect that number to be around 2,000.

That would come on top of the 2,400 troops who are there now, bringing the deployed number at the border close to the high of 5,900 that it reached in the weeks surrounding the midterm elections in November.

As far as I can tell, this order came out of nowhere on Tuesday while I was reflecting on the immigrant rights march in Santa Fe.

The first time Trump ordered troops to the border last fall, it fed into his narrative that the U.S. was threatened by the impending “invasion” of a caravan of Central Americans (families who were slowly walking their way north through Mexico to eventually apply for asylum in the U.S., and had banded together for protection along the treacherous journey). It’s illegal for the armed forces to perform law enforcement activities like, say apprehending people who cross the border illegally, so their actual responsibilities were extremely limited once they were deployed. But this was the run-up to the midterm elections, and Republican candidates were hammering immigration policy and border security in their campaigns. Deploying troops provided the drama and visuals those candidates needed to stir up fear. In short, the move seemed like a cheap political stunt—or rather, an expensive one.

This time around, troops still won’t be allowed to provide more than limited support to Border Patrol operations on the ground. So, it’s still more stunt than anything. The question is, why now? My immediate speculation is that the Trump administration faced a lot of backlash from right-wing media when he agreed to reopen the government last Friday after a record-setting 35-day partial shutdown. Fox pundits and vitriolic radio commentators wanted him to hold out for that $5.7 billion in wall funding, which the Democratic House refused to grant. Now he needs a quick and easy move that lets him claim he’s still tough on the issue of border security. When the executive branch can’t wrangle Congress to bend to its well, what action can it take unilaterally? Deploy troops.

I’m sure there will be plenty more reporting over the next few weeks on the question of the troops, the wall, its funding, and whether or not the government will be shut down all over again come February 15, when the latest continuing resolution is set to expire.

For now I’ll just say this about media coverage of the issue: journalists and news organizations based in Washington, New York, and other far-flung cities have a bad habit of referring to “the border” as a monolithic entity or a single spot on the map. It’s not. It’s 1,989 miles of diverse mountains, desert, and river. Where exactly along those miles are most migrants attempting to cross? Are the largest groups headed for urban ports of entry, remote stretches of desert, thin bands of river? How about cartel activity and drug smuggling—does that tend to happen in the same regions where would-be laborers or asylum-seekers approach the border? How about these troops—are they being sent to cities or desert or ranches? Are they all clumped together or evenly sprinkled along the border from coast to coast? Are they strategically positioned at places with high local cartel activity, or where migrant caravans are expected to approach—or neither? Maybe they’re just deployed to random federal lands for the sake of convenience and a photogenic backdrop.

You wouldn’t know any of the above from the national coverage I’ve read in the last couple days, including this New York Time article: it doesn’t mention California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Texas. It doesn’t discuss specific locations or landscapes or strategy. The only geography it names is “the southwestern border.”

How is anyone supposed to have an informed conversation about what’s needed on the ground if we don’t even know whether various caravans, cartels, and troops end up within a thousand miles of each other once they each reach the vague “southwestern border”? 

Santa Fe Isn't Too Far by Karie Luidens

Rail Runner (1).JPG

Okay. I’ve gotten a good refresher on the legislative process, and local activists have directed my attention to immigration-related bills currently working their way through the New Mexico Legislature. I have a feeling I’ll return to the State Capitol in the coming weeks to see how things progress. After all, Santa Fe isn’t too far from Albuquerque, and I’ve always loved commuting up on the Rail Runner. It’s about time I get acquainted with the inside of the Roundhouse.

Santa Fe Is Where It’s At by Karie Luidens

Santa+Fe+Roundhouse.jpg

I’ve participated in plenty of political marches over the years. But Monday’s Día de Acción was different: for the first time I didn’t just hold a sign and walk with the crowd, I benefited from real training about how to lobby legislators to support specific bills.

That’s why local chapters of Somos Un Pueblo Unido traveled from the far corners of New Mexico to converge in Santa Fe for the day. Marching to the State Capitol isn’t just symbolic. That’s where the state’s legislators are currently in session, discussing bills in committee and voting for or against them on the floor. When it comes to the brass tacks of legislating, Santa Fe is where it’s at.

If you’ve seen Schoolhouse Rock, you know how a bill becomes a law at the federal level. The process is pretty much the same here in New Mexico:

  1. Someone writes a bill. Anyone writes a bill—an individual, an organization, a legislator.

  2. A legislator introduces that bill to either the House (if he or she is a representative) or Senate (if he or she is a senator).

  3. The bill is assigned to the House or Senate’s relevant committees, where groups of legislators discuss its merits and decide whether to bring it to the floor in a plenary session. If they choose not to, the bill dies in committee.

  4. If the bill passes a vote in a plenary session of one body, it goes to the other to repeat the process—from the House to the Senate or vice versa.

  5. If the bill also passes the second round of committees and the second floor vote, it goes to the governor to either sign or veto.

What’s not specified in that process? The role of lobbyists—that is, people who advocate for or against bills at any step along the way, pressuring legislators to act in their interest.

Anyone can lobby. For most people, the word “lobbyist” conjures the image of a suit-and-tie professional who’s paid to represent a specific interest group (an industry, a company, a nonprofit…). But if you act to influence your legislators, you’re a lobbyist, too.

Lobbying can mean calling your representatives or senators, writing letters, signing petitions, marching, rallying, attending committee meetings or plenary sessions, scheduling meetings to talk with your legislators, or literally hanging out in the lobby outside their offices so you can catch them for a few minutes to talk while they walk to their next appointment.

To lobby effectively, we don’t just describe our values or opinions in vague terms, we talk about specific bills. We tell our legislators whether we want them to advance those specific bills or kill them in committee, and whether we want them to vote for or against the bills if they make it to a plenary session.

Which brings us back to some of the bills that are up for debate in New Mexico’s 2019 legislative session.

Here’s how Olivia Harlow summed it up in her story for the Santa Fe New Mexican yesterday, “New Mexico Capitol rally focuses on workers, immigrants”:

The group outlined a variety of bills of interest, including Senate Bill 196, which would prevent state and local agencies from expending resources to enforce federal immigration law; House Bill 141, which would prohibit state agencies from disclosing sensitive information; House Bill 31, intended to raise the state minimum wage to $12 per hour; and Senate Bill 278, aimed to limit obstacles in maintaining a driver’s license or ID.

The legislative process can feel dense and opaque. But anyone can read the full text of any bill at any time, and monitor its progress as it advances through the legislative process (or dies along the way). Democracy!

So, I took note of the bills listed by local activists at Saturday’s Love Has No Borders panel in Albuquerque and Monday’s Día de Acción in Santa Fe. Then I did my homework and looked them up online. Here are a couple of the big ones related to immigration and the border:

SB 196: NO RESOURCES FOR FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW

AN ACT

RELATING TO FEDERAL USE OF STATE RESOURCES; PROHIBITING STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES FROM EXPENDING RESOURCES TO ENFORCE FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS; RESTRICTING AUTHORITY OF SHERIFFS AND JAILS TO HOLD FEDERAL DETAINEES; REPEALING A REFERENCE IN STATE LAW TO A REPEALED FEDERAL LAW.

[full text]

HB 287: NO USE OF STATE RESOURCES FOR BORDER WALL

AN ACT

RELATING TO STATE RESOURCES; PROHIBITING THE USE OF STATE LAND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACEMENT OF A BARRIER ORDERED OR SOUGHT BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ON THE STATE'S BORDER WITH MEXICO; PROHIBITING THE USE OF STATE RESOURCES TO BE USED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACEMENT OF A WALL OR BARRIER ON THE BORDER BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND MEXICO; DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.

[full text]

Santa Fe Es Familia by Karie Luidens

Santa+Fe+Es+Familia.jpg

The sky was just beginning to lighten yesterday when I drove over the railroad tracks and past the shadowy silhouettes of Albuquerque’s downtown. My goal: get to El Centro de Igualdad y Derechos in time to join a bus or carpool up to Santa Fe for the day. I parked on a side street only to be disappointed: the lights were on, but nobody was home. There was just one other man waiting at the center’s door, bundled in a coat and knit cap.

El Centro de Igualdad y Derechos, Albuquerque

“Hi!” I called as I walked up. “Are you here for the Immigrant Day of Action?”

“Yeah, but it’s locked.”

We shook hands through his fingerless gloves and chatted for a few minutes. Still no sign of the others; did we have the time wrong? After a few minutes I told him I didn’t want to miss the 8:30 training, so I’d just drive up myself.

“If people show up and anyone’s wondering, you can tell them Karie drove separately, they don’t need to wait for me.”

“Karie? I’ll say la rubia.”

“Sorry?”

He laughed. “The blonde.”

“Oh!” I laughed too. “That is absolutely right. The blonde.”

Of the hundreds of us who marched and rallied later that morning, I would indeed turn out to be one of only a handful of blondes. I learned of the event through the ACLU’s publicity, but it was actually organized by Somos Un Pueblo Unido, an “immigrant-led organization that promotes worker and racial justice.” This fact was unmistakable when I walked into the Santa Fe Farmer’s Market Pavilion an hour later: nearly everyone there was speaking Spanish. The space echoed with a sprawling crowd, and more people continued to trickle in, talking, sitting, calling to one another, hugging like old friends, watching their kids chase each other and shriek and laugh. There was a lot of laughter. Most people wore matching yellow T-shirts, too, from the toddler on whom it draped to knee-level to elderly couples with white hair and creased faces and stooped frames. “SOMOS ACCIÓN” was printed in big letters beneath a sunburst. Beneath that:

JUSTICIA PARA NUESTRAS FAMILIAS
=
PROSPERIDAD PARA TODOS

JUSTICE FOR OUR FAMILIES
=
PROSPERITY FOR ALL

Spanish first, then English. So it went for the next two hours of training—the packets they passed out, the PowerPoint slides they projected, the presenters’ explanations. In fact, the presenters rarely spoke English at all unless they were prompted by a specific question. This Día de Acción del Inmigrante y del Trabajador was truly by and for Spanish-speaking immigrants.

I don’t speak Spanish. Well, hablo un poco—estudio español, pero no conozco muchas palabras. So I sat quietly through the training and just tried to absorb as much as I could, including reading the packets they handed out to everyone. They covered the structure of the New Mexico legislature, the process by which bills become laws, and the fine points of several bills that are currently in the works.

More on those bills later. First: we march! At 11 o’clock, some four hundred of us hit the streets. Our long train of pueblo unido wound its way through Santa Fe to the Roundhouse, where the legislature is in session. A forest of colorful signs bobbed overhead; cars honked their support and flashed thumbs up as they passed, at which we erupted in cheers each time. The teens in front of me giggled and joked while the older women behind me led fierce chants: El PUEBLO / UNIDO / JAMAS SERA VENCIDO. The people / united / will never be defeated. As we reached the State Capitol, our long parade spilled into a single throbbing crowd met by live music and a table of hot foil-wrapped burritos for everyone. Marching and cheering became dancing and feasting. The day of community action, like the sun itself, hit its high point at noon.

Join Us in Santa Fe by Karie Luidens

2019-01-28 - ACLU Immigrant Day of Action.jpg

Everyone who attended Saturday’s panel on immigration left with a printout detailing how we could volunteer, where we could make donations, and what legislation is currently worth lobbying for.

Sure, I can call my state legislators. But I’ll do you one better—it so happens that ACLU of New Mexico is hosting an Immigrant Day of Action at the state capital the following Monday. Count me in.

A Church in Las Cruces by Karie Luidens

Church+Shelter+Cots.jpg

After attending Saturday’s panel presentation, I spent most of the day Sunday going through the notes I scribbled, photos I took, and a few audio clips I recorded. Here’s my transcription of Sayrah’s story.

I volunteer at a makeshift shelter based out of a church in Las Cruces. All of us who volunteer there have had a background check, we all were trained, we’re very very concerned about preventing—the history of the Catholic Church is unfortunately at play, so they’re really scrupulous about providing checks and training for people who are working in the shelter. Everyone that’s there is a parent with children.

The way that it works is the detention centers are very full. Recently an article in the El Paso Times talked about cells designed to hold ten people holding closer to thirty or fifty people. Migrants tell us they’re getting one bottle of water a day. And so when we think about the young girl who died in New Mexico, her father says she was given one bottle of water a day. I can’t go on one bottle of water, especially if I had come from a journey. There’s freezing temperatures, it’s really horrible for people. And they’re kept in cells, and they’re sleeping on cement floors.

When they come to our shelter, they’re being released because of the ruling that children cannot be kept longer than I believe it was 21 days. So they’re being released with their parents.

I.C.E. actually drops them off at our shelter. They have this very tenuous situation where they’re releasing people to shelters into Las Cruces. They create a lot of chaos, they don’t communicate, they’re very difficult. We don’t have good things to say about them, but they do have to release people somewhere and we’re willing to support people that are released.

When they first get released, they have nothing but the clothes on their back. Many of them have experienced tremendous violence, they have had everything taken from them, and they have nothing. They’ve been through a lot of trauma.

We, before they get there, we set up the shelter with cots, which is better than the cement floor they’ve been on. We get new clothing for them so they can have a change of clothes. We have hot showers so they can shower. They have no clothes except the ones they journeyed in. We make a caldo, it’s a really healthy comfort food with like chicken and veggie stew, we have tortillas, we have oranges and fruit, we have a volunteer doctor who does a medical assessment on everyone who comes in, and there are really people who are sick and children who are sick. This is all volunteer staff. It’s all donations, we use donations to run it.

When they come off the bus, they don’t know where they’re coming to and they’re very afraid. All they’ve experienced has been people being horrible to them. And so we make a welcome line so as they come off the bus and they enter the shelter, we’re welcoming them, we hug them, we greet them. When we serve them caldo we sit with them and we eat with them, we’re not standing over them, we’re eating with them. If they want to tell us their story they can, but we don’t question them. We just want to eat with them.

The children start to warm up. There’s toys, they realize it’s not a detention center. The first thing they notice is there’s a hallway, they can run. Some of them start running up and down the hallway! I mean, they’ve been locked up in jail. Up until now they’ve been on a journey where they have to be quiet, they have to hide—and now they can play, they can run. Some of the kids are too traumatized and they don’t run in the hallway, they sit in the corner and we might get a puzzle out for them.

People are able to go shower, pick out fresh clothing. Some of the women have been carrying babies and we offer to hold their babies so they can finally shower and to give them a break.

And then we have a travel room. That’s the room people really want to go to, and everyone gets to eventually, it takes all day and all evening. It’s the first time they can use a phone. We give them our phones and they call their family. They call their sponsor. One time a man took my phone and the battery was dead so he brought it back, but he was so happy to finally get to talk to someone, to say “I’m safe, I made it, how do I get to you?”

Everyone needs to get to their sponsor. And their sponsor is not in New Mexico. So at this point they have the case for asylum, and their sponsor might be in Kentucky, Indiana, Florida, or Rhode Island, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and we have to get people all over the country. So in the travel room, we have all our volunteers, and our job is to help find a bus or a plane ticket that can get them from Las Cruces to wherever they’re going.

I had a woman ask me, how far is it by bus to Kentucky? I said maybe two or three days, and she just started crying. She had all these children with her, and she thought she was finally to her sponsor. But our country is so large, land-wise, and so, she was just realizing that.

So. We stay up till ten o’clock at night trying to get everyone’s bus tickets. Then people can sleep there, and in the morning we have another group of volunteers that takes people to the bus station and the airport. People have not ridden our planes, some of them don’t speak English, they don’t speak Spanish, they only speak their indigenous language. So this is a really hard process of like, how do you get people on the bus that’s gonna transfer from here to Texas, Texas to Atlanta, Atlanta to Florida, Florida to—I mean, trying to explain that.

The donations you brought today for food, for snacks—we don’t always have money to give people. And so we’re packing their bags with as many healthy snacks as we can, because they might be on a 3-day bus journey with children and no money. Someone really generous in Albuquerque at a donation drive just put an envelope full of $20 bills. I don’t know who it was. I was so moved that they trusted me. It felt so good to go down there that night and give a $20 bill to every person that was getting on the bus with their children. I though, okay, at least I know that they’ve got $20 between here and Rhode Island.

I want to lift up these incredible women in Las Cruces. It’s almost entirely women, I was comparing notes with Eleanor in El Paso and it’s almost entirely women there too doing this work at Annunciation House. These are the people who are resisting. These are the people who are showing a different version than the oppressive system that we’re in. We need radical system change, but we also need to help people each day. We need both.

Albuquerque Is a Small World by Karie Luidens

2019-01-26+-+Love+Has+No+Borders.jpg

Albuquerque is a small city. A small world, really. Live here three years and it’s like you know everyone, or at least keep running into the same people.

One of the presenters yesterday, Sayrah—I knew her name was familiar—also presented at last year’s library seed swap, where I stocked up on so many of the seeds for my garden. That bowl of tiny amaranth seeds? She brought those. The forest of fuchsia amaranth lining our wooden fence behind the tomatoes and eggplants grew from a single teaspoon of her generosity.

Another of the presenters was my friend’s younger brother. The last time I saw Nicolas, we were talking at a house party: I was scooping his homecooked beans from a crock pot into a bowl while he recommended one of his favorite cookbooks, Decolonize Your Diet. I dutifully read it a month later and was happy to add it to my bookshelf. It includes recipes for amaranth, by the way.

How funny to take a seat at that talk, look up, and realize I knew half the panel. I didn’t just know them, I’d grown their seeds and eaten their food.

Turns out, in the year since I’ve seen them, they’ve been busy. Nicolas camped out at Tornillo to protest the tent city where I.C.E. has housed thousands of children who were apprehended after crossing our southern border. Sayrah volunteers with asylum-seekers, helping to house, clothe, and feed them after I.C.E. releases them to makeshift shelters in Las Cruces.

It’s easy to feel useless, sitting at a dining room table, reading the news, close and far all at once. That’s how I felt the other day. But I’ve got the power to act, too. Start listening, and you’ll learn where action is needed.

Love Has No Borders by Karie Luidens

2019-01-26 - Love Has No Borders.png

I forgot—a few weeks ago I signed up to attend an event this afternoon. Facebook reminded me over my morning coffee:

“Love Has No Borders: Supporting Refugees at Our Border“

Today at 3 PM – 5 PM
Starts in about 6 hours · 48°F Sunny
Nahalat Shalom
3606 Rio Grande Blvd NW, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87107

Details

Come learn about how you can help volunteers who are providing assistance to the Central American families at the border and how to participate in the direct action and protests against the oppression of refugees at our borders.

Eye witness accounts from:
Eleanor Chavez, long time labor and community activist, has been volunteering with refugees through Annunciation House in El Paso

Sayrah Namaste, Abq activist, has been volunteering in Las Cruces with Central American refugees and organizing donation drives

Hope Alvarado, a lead organizer with The Red Nation fighting for Indigenous Liberation through a lens of Anti-Settler Colonialism, Anti-Border Imperialism and smashing the patriarchy — they’ve been resisting at the Occupation in Tornillo. .

DONATIONS ARE WELCOME IF YOU WANT TO BRING THE THINGS REQUESTED: PLEASE DO NOT BRING ANY DONATIONS NOT REQUESTED BY THE SHELTERS:
For Annuncation House:
Travel sized toiletries (shampoo, soap, toothpaste, etc)
Deodorant
Cleaning supplies
Gosner shelf milk
Boxes of cereal

For Las Cruces shelter:
--healthy travel snacks (granola bars, peanut butter crackers, fruit snacks, etc)
—coffee
--drawstring bags for carrying a change of clothes and food
--crayons, coloring books, small toy cars
--women's underwear, size small, NEW only
--men's underwear, size small, dark colors preferred,NEW only
--containers of hot cocoa mix
—teenage boy & girl jeans & leggings, size small

Where Is the Emergency? by Karie Luidens

Antelope+Wells+Border+Patrol.jpg

Current headline on the Albuquerque Journal’s website:

“Group of 306 migrants turn themselves in to Border Patrol at Antelope Wells”
BY ANGELA KOCHERGA / JOURNAL STAFF WRITER - LAS CRUCES BUREAU
Published: Friday, January 25th, 2019 at 10:38am

Of course, there’s already a vitriolic mix of reader comments on the link’s Facebook post.

“Wait, I thought the left wing was saying this was a manufactured crisis….”

“Please deliver them safely to Nancy’s house.”

“Proves that immigrants are willing to turn themselves in, just don’t crucify them!”

“..and our new Governor says it is not a problem! Please work with our President!”

“Again!!!! READ MY LIPS!!! NO CRISIS ON THE BORDER…. <sarcasm>. Pathetic! Thank you for doing your job reporting and not being an activists for the democratic controlled state.”

“Turn them back and tell them to go to Tijuana.”

“Where is the emergency, unarmed children, women and men fled from poverty, gangs and deathsquads!”

As for me, after reading the article and groaning my way through the comments, I turned to the paper map of New Mexico that’s tacked to our dining room wall and traced the route from Albuquerque to Antelope Wells. 330 miles; close to five hours of driving.

I don’t know what I’m contemplating. I just have this urge to witness what’s really happening at the border there. Sitting at a table in New Mexico’s biggest city, I feel so close and so far. Even the reporter who wrote the article seems to be firmly rooted in Las Cruces, which is only halfway closer—150 miles from the port of entry, two and a half hours of driving. Her facts, quotes, and photos are all credited to the Border Patrol itself. There’s no information about what happened next—where were these 306 migrants, “mostly parents with children and unaccompanied minors from Central America” who “arrived just after midnight on Thursday” (last night) sent after they were apprehended? How are their asylum claims being processed? Where are they being held?

Last month, two Guatemalan children died in U.S. custody in the days after their fathers turned themselves in—after they were apprehended. According to the Border Patrol’s news release this time, “Some of the juveniles were in need of immediate medical assistance and were transported to local hospitals for treatment of various illnesses and injuries.” How are they now? How can we know? Is anyone investigating, or do we just wait to see if the Border Patrol releases another statement?

Apparently “This is the 26th group of more than 100 people to come across the border in the remote area since October. Most are Central Americans seeking asylum.”

Where are they now?

So much huffing and puffing of hot air in Washington and on cable TV over the border and a bollard fence or five-billion-dollar wall. But who’s actually there to see what it’s like, what’s needed, who’s dangerous or in danger, who’s exploiting or being exploited?

I want to drive the five hours down there and camp and see for myself. But I’d be so useless, Anglo and alone in all that desert.

What Do You Have to Say? by Karie Luidens

Newspaper Elijah ODonnell Unsplash.jpg

Dear Editor,

With so many political opinions spewing on social media these days, it's hard to believe your "Letters" page is facing a shortage. And yet in v28 i2 you wrote that "these days, [you] rarely receive letters from locals."

I hope this week you're so inundated by New Mexicans' opinions that you don't have room to print this. But just in case, here's what's on my mind here in Albuquerque.

Trump's televised Oval Office address on Jan. 8 was just the latest in his years-long pattern of race-baiting, fear-mongering and fact-altering.

He said there’s “a growing humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border.” In fact, there's no new or noteworthy threat to our national security. And the only humanitarian crisis is the one manufactured by his policies—criminalizing everyone who crosses outside a port of entry, rather than distinguishing between traffickers and asylum seekers; separating children from their families, without any procedure to reunite them; imprisoning immigrants for prolonged periods, rather than freeing them while they await their day in court.

He said “90 percent of [heroin in the US] floods across from our southern border.” In fact, the vast majority of illicit drugs imported from Mexico are smuggled at legal crossings—to say nothing of fentanyl flown in from China or home-cooked meth. Walls in the wilderness won't address any drug crises.

He said a wall would “be paid for indirectly by the great new trade deal we have made with Mexico.” In fact, that is simply not how tariffs or budget appropriations work.

Here are the facts. Constructing hundreds of miles of new steel fencing or concrete wall would disrupt ecosystems, sever sovereign tribal land and block desperate asylum-seekers who have a legal right to enter the country and plead their case. Meanwhile, illegal drug and human trafficking would continue the way it always has: in trucks and shipped packages, through official ports of entry and tunnels.

But Trump doesn't care about facts. He cares about the cheers of his riled-up base and the applause of TV pundits. Sean Hannity and Ann Coulter have become our White House policy advisors. Stephen Miller is our national propaganda generator. Trump's Twitter feed claims to speak for us. Hell, the Conservative Caucus of Warrentown, Va., gets to fill the pages of our Albuquerque alt.weekly?

Hey, New Mexicans—what do you have to say about all this?

It was here in New Mexico, near the remote Antelope Wells port of entry, that 7-year-old Jakelin Caal crossed into the US to seek asylum. After less than 48 hours in Border Patrol custody, she died of dehydration and shock.

It was here in New Mexico, at a bare-bones facility in Alamogordo, that 7-year-old Felipe Gómez Alonzo was held for two days. On Christmas Eve, he died at an Alamogordo hospital.

It's here in New Mexico, across our rugged desert and private ranches, that Trump wants to seize land and stud it with steel. Not because he cares what happens here—just for a photo op and bragging rights.

What do the people of New Mexico think about the fact that Trump's orders have deliberately created bottlenecks at the country's busiest ports of entry in San Diego and El Paso, grinding asylum applications to a virtual standstill? What do we think about the fact that this manufactured backlog is shunting desperate people into the dangerously remote desert in between—our state's southern border? How do we feel, knowing that this administration's policies have caused children to die in our hospitals? That next they want to spend billions of taxpayers dollars to plant steel bollards across our landscape? How do you like being a political football for the rest of the country's raging debates?

Personally, I'm sick of everyone else speaking for us. Write to the Alibi. Let's talk.

Karie Luidens,
Albuquerque